In textile products, different fiber types (for example natural fibers: cotton, wool; synthetic fibers: polyester, rayon, etc.) are often distinguished not just by their physical and chemical properties, but also — in an alternative wellness paradigm — by their “vibrational frequencies”. According to this viewpoint, a fabric’s frequency may interact with the human body’s biofrequency and thereby influence health, energy level and comfort.
Human Body Frequency
Some sources state that the “healthy human body” resonates at approximately 100 units of frequency.
When the frequency drops below this threshold, it’s suggested that biofrequency may be disturbed and the body’s energy may be lowered.
Proposed Frequency Values for Different Fibers
Here are some indicative values from alternative-sources for various fibers:
Fiber Type Frequency Value Notes
Wool ~ 5 000 High-frequency natural fiber.
Linen ~ 5 000 Also high-frequency natural fiber.
Organic Cotton ~ 100 Close to the human body frequency.
Conventional Cotton ~ 70 Lower than organic variant.
Silk ~ 15 Despite being natural, low frequency due to processing.
Polyester (Synthetic) ~ 15 or 0 Senthetic fibers indicated as very low frequency.
Implications for Human Health
If a fabric fiber’s frequency is near or above the human body’s frequency, the fiber is considered more “harmonious”, potentially offering supportive or balancing effects. For example, organic cotton (~100 units) can be seen as a “resonant” fiber.
Conversely, synthetic fibers (like polyester) are described as having very low frequencies, which may lead to disharmony with the body’s energy field, possibly contributing to fatigue, discomfort, or weaker energy.
Natural fibers that register higher frequencies are also praised for physical benefits such as breathability, moisture regulation, and comfort (for instance wool, linen) — in addition to their proposed energetic benefits.
It’s essential to remember that frequency is only one factor; manufacturing, chemical treatments, dyeing, blends and finishing processes can reduce a fiber’s effective “vibrational” characteristics.
Cautions & Notes
From a conventional textile-engineering standpoint, “fiber frequency” is not a widely studied, standardized measure. These values come from holistic/alternative energy health contexts, not mainstream peer-reviewed textile science.
Therefore, when writing for a blog, it’s advisable to frame this as an “alternative perspective” or “vibrational wellness view” rather than absolute scientific fact.
Also note: fabric composition, treatment, blends (e.g., 65% polyester/35% cotton) can significantly alter any proposed frequency effect.
In terms of health, textile choice involves more than vibrational frequency: breathability, hypoallergenic properties, chemical residue, and antimicrobial performance matter too.
Summary
When considering fiber contents, one can look beyond just “cotton versus polyester” to include the dimension of “vibrational frequency” — for example: “organic cotton (≈ 100 units) may support your body’s frequency, while polyester may register much lower”. This viewpoint can help create added value in your blog for readers interested in wellness and consciousness-oriented textile choices.